Creative Problem Solving and Decision Making
- Define a problem precisely using problem statements, 5 Whys and the Is/Is Not technique.
- Generate a broad range of options using brainstorming, SCAMPER, lateral thinking and reverse brainstorming.
- Evaluate options with weighted criteria, feasibility checks and risk assessment.
- Recognise cognitive biases such as anchoring and groupthink and apply techniques to reduce them.
- Build an action plan with owners, milestones and success measures to implement a chosen solution.
- Problem Solving Mindset
- Convergent and divergent thinking
- Barriers to creative thinking at work
- The Creative Problem Solving process
- Clarifying the Problem
- Gathering facts and defining the real issue
- 5 Whys, Is/Is Not and fishbone diagrams
- Writing a focused problem statement
- Generating Ideas
- Brainstorming and brainwriting
- SCAMPER and attribute listing
- Lateral thinking and reverse brainstorming
- Evaluating and Selecting Options
- Weighted decision matrices
- Feasibility, cost-benefit and risk screening
- Group decision techniques and consensus
- Decision Quality and Bias
- Common cognitive biases in decisions
- Pre-mortem and devil's advocate techniques
- Decisions under time pressure
- Implementation and Learning
- Action planning and stakeholder buy-in
- Monitoring results and adjusting
- After-action reviews
الحصول على الكتيب
للحصول على كتيب بكامل محتويات الدورة برجاء ملء النموذج التالي ببياناتك الصحيحة

Program Professional Framework
Creative Problem Solving and Decision Making
Program Overview
Many workplace problems resist standard fixes because they are poorly defined or have several valid answers. This program combines structured creative problem solving with disciplined decision making: clarifying the real problem, generating options with the Osborn-Parnes CPS process, SCAMPER and lateral thinking, evaluating options with decision matrices and risk checks, and gaining commitment for implementation. Participants work on live problems from their own organizations, learning to balance fresh ideas with evidence and the practical constraints typical of Gulf public and private entities.
Learning Outcomes
- ✓Define a problem precisely using problem statements, 5 Whys and the Is/Is Not technique.
- ✓Generate a broad range of options using brainstorming, SCAMPER, lateral thinking and reverse brainstorming.
- ✓Evaluate options with weighted criteria, feasibility checks and risk assessment.
- ✓Recognise cognitive biases such as anchoring and groupthink and apply techniques to reduce them.
- ✓Build an action plan with owners, milestones and success measures to implement a chosen solution.
Target Audience
- Supervisors and team leaders
- Process improvement and quality professionals
- Project coordinators and analysts
- Professionals leading cross-functional working groups
Detailed Program Modules
01Problem Solving Mindset
- Convergent and divergent thinking
- Barriers to creative thinking at work
- The Creative Problem Solving process
02Clarifying the Problem
- Gathering facts and defining the real issue
- 5 Whys, Is/Is Not and fishbone diagrams
- Writing a focused problem statement
03Generating Ideas
- Brainstorming and brainwriting
- SCAMPER and attribute listing
- Lateral thinking and reverse brainstorming
04Evaluating and Selecting Options
- Weighted decision matrices
- Feasibility, cost-benefit and risk screening
- Group decision techniques and consensus
05Decision Quality and Bias
- Common cognitive biases in decisions
- Pre-mortem and devil's advocate techniques
- Decisions under time pressure
06Implementation and Learning
- Action planning and stakeholder buy-in
- Monitoring results and adjusting
- After-action reviews
Training Methodology
Applied Project & Assessment
Applied Project
Participants bring a current workplace problem, apply the full process from problem definition to option generation and weighted evaluation, and submit a decision brief with the chosen solution, key risks and an implementation plan.
Assessment
Short diagnostic at the start, practical tasks linked to each learning outcome, and evaluation of the applied project against published criteria.


